Archive for June, 2008

Murmur.Silence.Touch – interactive art at the Gordart Gallery

June 29th, 2008 by christo


Murmur.Silence.Touch by Jenna Burchell

One of the first truly interactive art works that I’ve seen at a commercial gallery in South Africa is the installation, Murmur.Silence.Touch by Jenna Burchell in the Rainforest Project Room at the Gordart in Melville, Johannesburg.

Burchell writes of her installation:

Through building spaces that illustrate the mental "inscape" of individuals, I aim to pull down the barriers of traditional portraiture and search for new ways to portray the deeper existential core of people. In doing this the voice of the sitter is freed and a dialogue with the viewer is brought to life.

This interchange is created through computer controlled, interactive objects stripped down with bereft aesthetics, parodying the hard edged technology with organic beauty. While surrounded by such a flux the viewer can find in their mind the faces and lives of the sitter.

Gordart gallery owner, Gordon Froude, getting tech support from the artist
to get Jenna Burchill’s interactive work rebooted and working again on the
day after the lauch.  At present this is one of the drawbacks of computer-based installation art.
Note the audio processing boards in the box, while he feels around for the on/off switch.

The work turned the back end of the installation
into a delicate tracery of patterned wires.

The audio circuit of the installation with the computer,  which is driving the
system, in the background.

glove

"Put on a glove and touch the wires" The installation invited visitors to put on a specially
prepared glove with two metal foil contacts. Quite how the work was to be played
was left to the user to work out; but the long wires protruding from the middle of
the frame, like metallic Rapunzel hairs, seemed to invite touch.

Robin Kelly interacting with Murmur.Silence.Touch by Jenna Burchell.
Running the glove along the paired wires produced a susurrus of
voices speaking softly.


How to write for the Web

June 25th, 2008 by christo

Slate has been running some excellent "how-to" articles on the most effective ways of writing for the Web.  Senior Editor, Michael Agger, has a  concise and somewhat tongue-in-cheek demonstration of  "readable"  writing techniques using the theory of  Web usability expert  Jakob Nielsen.  While Editor at Large, Jack Shafer,  extoles  the superb meditation by Caleb Crain entitled  How is the internet changing literary style?  Like Shafer, I have to admit, that after reading Crain’s essay, "I’ll never read the Web the same again."

The consequences of these changes in writing  (and our habits of "information retrieval" ) are explored by  Nicholas Carr in his Atlantic  essay, Is Google Making Us Stupid?

Over the past few years I’ve had an uncomfortable sense that someone, or something, has been tinkering with my brain, remapping the neural circuitry, reprogramming the memory. My mind isn’t going—so far as I can tell—but it’s changing. I’m not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I’m reading.

The Atlantic, of course, was the magazine that published the seminal essay by Vannevar Bush in 1945 that anticipated the development of information technology, As We May Think.  It’s an essay that is worth re-reading in the context of these discussions.  Although the Memex, the mechanical contraption at the centre of the essay was not to be, Bush anticipates many of the most significant features of the new  technologised mental landscape. For instance he could have been imagining Google when he writes:

Wholly new forms of encyclopedias will appear, ready made with a mesh of associative trails running through them, ready to be dropped into the memex and there amplified.

But what is most striking about re-reading the essay is Bush’s urgent conviction that without these information technologies we will be swamped in the vast amount of data that is generated by new forms of science and industry. It’s perhaps worth bearing this in mind when we consider the negative implications of the new orders of thinking and recall.