ICANN, the organisation that controls the allocation of top level domain names on the Internet, has just announced a historic deal in which it will distance itself from the US government. As reported in the UK Guardian:
ICANN – the official body that ultimately controls the development of the internet thanks to its oversight of web addresses such as .com, .net and .org – said today that it was ending its agreement with the US government.
The deal, part of a contract negotiated with the US department of commerce, effectively pushes California-based Icann towards a new status as an international body with greater representation from companies and governments around the globe.
ICANN had previously been operating under the auspices of the American government, which had control of the net thanks to its initial role in developing the underlying technologies used for connecting computers together.
But the fresh focus will give other countries a more prominent role in determining what takes place online, and even the way in which it happens – opening the door for a virtual United Nations, where many officials gather to discuss potential changes to the internet.
This, of course, is something that many countries have been demanding for the last couple of years.
In November 2005, over 15,000 international representatives, ranging from tech company CEOs to NGOs and Heads of State, gathered in Tunis, under the auspices of the UN for the World Summit on the Information Society. Unfortunately, the World Summit, featuring well known champions of free information such as Robert Mugabe, didn’t inspire much confidence in its goal of a UN-controlled administration of the Internet. Since ICANN was set up in 1998, the degree of actual US government control was rather limited - and took the form of reviews. Under the new agreement, the US government reviews have been dropped and, as reported by the LA Times, "ICANN now will be reviewed by a broader-based group of stakeholders from around the world."
However the latest move by ICANN, however cynical an attempt to manipulate the international call for a less US-centric Internet, seems to be a better way to accommodate competing national and business interests while maintaining the information neutrality that has been the central factor in the global success of the medium.